 |
| The inter-barangay visitors registration EO. Interaksyon photo |
A Legazpi City resident is opposing a P1,000 per day penalty
proposed by her barangay if residents do not abide by the Office of the Mayor’s
Executive Order No. 36-2017, which requires persons staying at another barangay
for 24 hours or more to register his or her name, purpose, and duration of stay
at the barangay hall.
A local government official has stressed that the municipal
EO does not violate residents’ privacy, as well as their liberty of abode and
traveling.
EO No. 36-2017, or “An Executive Order Prescribing
Guidelines for the Inter-Barangay Travel Registration Mechanism” reasons that
the registration of visitors is needed to achieve a crime- and drug-free
country, and to protect barangays from drug users and pushers, as well as from
criminals and other “unwanted personalities”.
In a phone interview with InterAksyon, tour operator Jessica
Imperial said their barangay captain talked to her and her neighbors on
Thursday about the EO, mentioning that a nearby motel should comply and
proposing that there should be a penalty of P1,000 so that the EO would have
“teeth”.
“You cannot make a penalty just like that,” Imperial said.
“Sinong hindi aalma doon (Who wouldn’t oppose it)?”
Barangays should have uniform rules, she added. She also
disagreed with the thinking that those who weren’t doing anything wrong had no
reason to resist the penalty, and pointed out that their barangay hall was
relatively far, meaning they would have to take a tricycle every time they had
a visitor over for 24 hours or more.
“Why is this a concern for me? Because there would be room
for abuse,” Imperial said. “I feel that my rights are being curtailed.”
How would the authorities know that the visitor had been
staying in the resident’s home for 24 hours already?
“Ano, kakatukin ka nila sa bahay mo, ‘Hoy, may bisita ka, 24
hours na ‘yung bisita mo!’ Sasabihin mo, ‘Ay hindi, wala akong bisita.’ So what
are they going to do? Are they going to enter your house and force you? ‘Ito
‘yung bisita mo, andito sa kwarto mo, ayan, tinatago mo sa cabinet, o!’” she
asked.
(“Are they going to knock on your door, saying, ‘Hey, you
have a visitor, and your visitor has been there for 24 hours already!’ And you
say, ‘No, I don’t have a visitor.’ So what are they gonna do? Are they gonna
enter your house and force you? ‘Here’s your visitor, in your room, there, hiding
in your cabinet!'”)
“I may sound exaggerating, but, hey, these things can be
cause for abuse. Kasi paano kung may komisyon ‘yung humuhuli (What if the
enforcer has a commission to earn)? Iisipin nila, ‘May P1,000 ako kada isang
huli’ (They’ll think, ‘I have P1,000 per apprehension’),” she added.
“I’m already 40 years old and this is the first time I’ve
heard of this,” Imperial said, noting that she had lived in different cities in
Metro Manila, as well, and had never experienced anything similar to it. She
added that she had asked people who lived through Marcos-era Martial Law if
they were asked to register their visitors as well, and was told that they were
not.
She stressed that one’s right to privacy, right to travel,
and liberty of abode are all guaranteed by Article III of the 1987
Constitution.
Nevertheless, Imperial said, she was not angry with the
barangay captain, as he has no choice but to follow the EO. But, she said, they
might need a crash course on lawmaking, as they shouldn’t be imposing penalties
just because they wanted to.
As for Legazpi City Mayor Noel Rosal, she believed he had
good intentions, but it was possible that his legal advisers had not studied
the repercussions of the EO properly.
The inter-barangay visitors registration E.O.
In a Facebook post, Imperial suggested other ways to make
their community safe: “One is the bayanihan system where we look out for each
other. If there are suspicious-looking people in your community, then call 911
or a hotline number to inform the barangay.”
Also, she said that the barangay can assign roving tanods
24/7 for the residents’ security… “In subdivisions, guards ask for the ID of
each visitor and also ask them what house they are going to visit. In exclusive
subdivisions in Manila, guards even check first with the homeowner if they will
allow the visitors to enter. Can we do this instead?”
Meanwhile, National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers
secretary-general Atty. Edre Olalia called the EO “another ill-advised Big
Brother scheme under the guise of order but without peace.”
“It is in open violation not only of the fundamental right
to privacy but also freedom to travel and liberty of abode. Indeed it is open
to question of constitutionality. The problem really is that national and local
government officials and public officers take their cue and are emboldened by
the draconian gimmicks and fascist fantasies of the national leadership,” he
said. “(President Rodrigo) Duterte has sent the signal that brazen and
orchestrated violations of individual rights is the new normal and you can let
it slide in the name of the fight against criminality and drugs.”
In seeking the side of the LGU, InterAksyon was referred by
a staff member of the Office of the Mayor to an Atty. Belgica from its legal
office.
In reply to InterAksyon’s text, Belgica said that the LGU’s
stand was in a Facebook post he/she wrote. Asked for his/her Facebook account,
Belgica didn’t reply, nor did he/she answer InterAksyon’s calls.
The Facebook post is presumably that of Mayette Belgica-Cledera,
which reads:
“The Mayor’s Executive Order merely requires barangays to
keep a record of all non-residents who will stay in their barangay for more
than 24 hours… nothing more. This is not violative of one’s liberty of abode
and travel since it does not prohibit traveling from one barangay to another.
Neither is it a violation of one’s privacy. All you have to give is your name.
This is but akin to writing your name in the logbook before you enter
government offices, or private subdivisions, or hotels, or motels, etcetera.
This is not at all indicative of martial law, as some people already imply. So
I hope we will not make a big issue out of this…but really, if you find the EO
unconstitutional, then we welcome challenge before the proper forum. We will
abide if there will be a court pronouncement to that effect. Until then, we
will highly appreciate it if people will not overreact. Thank you.”
Atty. Bart Rayco of NUPL-Albay added that the Legazpi City
Mayor “overreached jumping in his executive order under the pretext of
maintaining peace and order and preventing criminality.”
On the registration of visitors, he said, “signing and
logging in when one visits government offices is an off-beam comparison. It is
certainly not similar to a visit to a relative or friend based on a very plain
reason: the first is official business while the second is private.” (Interaksyon)
No comments:
Post a Comment